Thinking in progress. Cite the papers, not these.
42-True · A Protocol for Privacy-Preserving Resolution of Declared Want
A network in which people declare what they want — and the network resolves those declarations into outcomes without ever observing the people who emit them. Defines the signal and the two failures of the existing system: the observational failure and the incentive failure.
42-True · Four layers, from a typed sentence to a resolvable unit of meaning
Signal → Classify → Match → Resolve. The intent pair as the atomic record, why it compounds across volume, fidelity and breadth, and the two revenue primitives: resolution fees and a metered inference API.
42-True · A credible thesis names what is new and concedes what is established
Adversarial honesty. Three model paradigms compared, a ledger of what is genuinely novel against what is prior art (RLHF reward shaping, Data Shapley, differential privacy, W3C DIDs), and three claims deliberately walked back.
42-True · Training architecture, three commitments, and who owns the model
Batch-level differential privacy and staged training. Three commitments: signals never linked to persistent identity, the corpus anonymised and differentially private, counterparties learn statistics and never people. Then the ownership question, and the constitutional commitments.